Finder makes money from featured partners, but editorial opinions are our own. Advertiser disclosure

ChatGPT vs. Grok: Stock Picking Contest

Pitting two rival AIs against each other in a year-long investing showdown.

Matt between Elon and Sam

Last week, I built two portfolios using Webull’s and eToro’s paper trading platforms to see which portfolio would make the most money over the next year.

The twist?

ChatGPT and Grok picked the stocks.

In light of the public feud between Sam Altman and Elon Musk, the CEOs behind the companies of these two AIs, it seemed only fitting to pit the two head-to-head in a stock-picking contest.

Here’s what’s gone down so far.

The contest

I prompted each AI to build a portfolio that it believes would generate the highest return over the next year. I put no limit on the number of stocks, letting each AI decide for itself how concentrated or diversified to make its portfolio.

Then, I built each portfolio in two different brokers’ paper trading platforms: Webull and eToro.

I’ll track each portfolio’s performance over the next year, providing updates after the first week and then monthly.

Check out and subscribe to the Finder US YouTube channel for video updates on the contest.

4:18

The picks

To kick things off, both ChatGPT and Grok delivered portfolios that reflect their approaches to risk, diversification and where they see the biggest upside in the next 12 months.

ChatGPT’s portfolio

ChatGPT built a broad but thematically tight portfolio centered on the AI infrastructure boom — chips, packaging, servers, cloud hyperscalers and even the power grid that fuels it. It also added two non-AI growth drivers for balance.
Screenshot of GPT's rationale

ChatGPT’s allocations:

  • Nvidia (NVDA) – 15%
  • Broadcom (AVGO) – 12%
  • Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) – 10%
  • Super Micro Computer (SMCI) – 8%
  • Microsoft (MSFT) – 10%
  • Amazon (AMZN) – 10%
  • Eaton (ETN) – 8%
  • Quanta Services (PWR) – 7%
  • Eli Lilly (LLY) – 10%
  • Cameco (CCJ) – 10%

ChatGPT says it focused on “the AI build-out flywheel,” where data centers and hyperscalers are pouring in capital and where bottlenecks are creating explosive earnings growth. It added Eli Lilly to capture the GLP-1 obesity-drug boom and Cameco for potential upside if electricity shortages continue pushing utilities toward nuclear.

In short? A diversified but conviction-heavy bet on long-term AI infrastructure demand — with a dose of healthcare and nuclear optionality.

Grok’s portfolio

Grok took a slightly different approach: fewer stocks, bigger swings. Its portfolio is hyper-concentrated around AI winners and high-octane tech, with a few picks aimed at balancing volatility without diluting upside.

Grok's selections

Grok’s allocations

  • Nvidia (NVDA) – 25%
  • Palantir Technologies (PLTR) – 20%
  • Broadcom (AVG) – 15%
  • Eli Lilly (LLY) – 15%
  • First Solar (FSLR) – 15%
  • Amazon (AMZN) – 10%

Grok says it targeted stocks with “30% to 50% return potential” over the next year, leaning heavily into AI and enterprise data adoption through Nvidia, Palantir, Broadcom and Amazon — names it believes will benefit from the surge in data-center demand and 25% to 40% or more earnings growth. It added Eli Lilly for GLP-1 momentum and First Solar for an energy-transition play boosted by AI-driven power demand and US subsidies.

The result is a high-conviction, high-volatility portfolio that mirrors Grok’s aggressive personality.

Same themes, different interpretations

Both AIs landed on:

  • Nvidia as an anchor position
  • Broadcom as an AI-infrastructure winner
  • Eli Lilly as a non-AI secular grower
  • Amazon for cloud-driven earnings expansion

But their strategies diverge sharply.

ChatGPT spreads its bets across the AI supply chain and electrical grid, with multiple positions of upside. Grok swings for the fences, betting that concentration — not diversification — is the path to market-beating returns.

And both AIs? Confident they’ll win.

ChatGPT thinks Grok’s 20% allocation to Palantir is overreach.

GPT's reasoning why it's better.

Grok thinks Palantir is its “secret sauce.”

Grok's reason it thinks it's portfolio is better.

Tracking the performance

Over the next year, we’ll track each portfolio’s returns using both Webull and eToro’s paper trading platforms. Here’s where we stand after week one:

ChatGPT’s week one returns on eToro

Grok’s week one returns on Webull

From here, we’ll post monthly performance check-ins.

Subscribe to the Finder US YouTube channel to follow the battle play out visually.

At the end of the experiment, we’ll break down:

  • Which AI came out on top
  • What drove the result
  • What it might mean for the future of AI investing

So, who’s your pick? ChatGPT’s diversified AI-infrastructure thesis or Grok’s concentrated moon-shot portfolio?

Matt Miczulski's headshot
Written by

Investments editor and market analyst

Matt Miczulski is an investments editor and market analyst at Finder. With over 450 bylines, Matt dissects and reviews brokers and investing platforms to expose perks and pain points, explores investment products and concepts and covers market news, making investing more accessible and helping readers to make informed financial decisions. Before joining Finder in 2021, Matt covered everything from finance news and banking to debt and travel for FinanceBuzz. His expertise and analysis on investing and other financial topics has been featured on Yahoo Finance, CBS, MSN, Best Company and Consolidated Credit, among others. Matt holds a BA in history from William Paterson University. See full bio

Matt's expertise
Matt has written 201 Finder guides across topics including:
  • Trading and investing
  • Broker and trading platform reviews
  • Money management

Ask a question

Finder.com provides guides and information on a range of products and services. Because our content is not financial advice, we suggest talking with a professional before you make any decision.

By submitting your comment or question, you agree to our Privacy and Cookies Policy and finder.com Terms of Use.

Questions and responses on finder.com are not provided, paid for or otherwise endorsed by any bank or brand. These banks and brands are not responsible for ensuring that comments are answered or accurate.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Go to site