ChatGPT vs. Grok: Stock Picking Contest
Pitting two rival AIs against each other in a year-long investing showdown.
Last week, I built two portfolios using Webull’s and eToro’s paper trading platforms to see which portfolio would make the most money over the next year.
The twist?
ChatGPT and Grok picked the stocks.
In light of the public feud between Sam Altman and Elon Musk, the CEOs behind the companies of these two AIs, it seemed only fitting to pit the two head-to-head in a stock-picking contest.
Here’s what’s gone down so far.
I prompted each AI to build a portfolio that it believes would generate the highest return over the next year. I put no limit on the number of stocks, letting each AI decide for itself how concentrated or diversified to make its portfolio.
Then, I built each portfolio in two different brokers’ paper trading platforms: Webull and eToro.
I’ll track each portfolio’s performance over the next year, providing updates after the first week and then monthly.
Check out and subscribe to the Finder US YouTube channel for video updates on the contest.
In light of the ongoing feud between Sam Altman and Elon Musk, we’re putting their two AIs head-to-head in a stock-picking showdown: ChatGPT versus Grok.
So, who can build a better portfolio?
And who will come out on top in our paper trading experiment? Let’s find out!
So we have ChatGPT, the AI known for its data crunching, research capabilities and market insights.
And Grok, an AI with access to real-time market data and deep learning algorithms.
We’re going to ask each AI to pick a portfolio that will make us the most money, and then track their performance using a paper-trading platform over the next year.
No limit on the number of stocks — we’ll let the AI decide on its own how concentrated or diversified to make its portfolio.
We’re tracking their portfolios over the next year because it tests each AI’s ability to make genuinely long-term predictions rather than react to short-term market movements.
Buy-and-hold forces conviction in their theses and mirrors real-world long-term investing.
The goal? To see which AI can deliver the highest returns — and maybe even learn a thing or two along the way.
Here’s how it works: I’ll prompt both ChatGPT and Grok to pick the stocks that each thinks will make the most money over the next year.
Again, no limit on the number of stocks — we’ll let the AI decide on its own how concentrated or diversified to make its portfolio.
Then, we’ll record their picks and invest virtual dollars using a paper trading platform.
Once the portfolios are set, we’ll track performance to see which AI seems to have a better market intuition — or maybe just luck!
Here are the portfolios.
ChatGPT has chosen:
ChatGPT says it concentrated on the AI build-out flywheel — chips, packaging, servers, cloud and the power grid that feeds it — because that’s where hyperscalers are pouring capex and bottlenecks create the fastest profit growth.
It added Eli Lilly for a separate secular earnings engine in GLP-1s and Cameco for torque if electricity scarcity keeps pushing utilities toward nuclear.
Grok, meanwhile, went with:
Grok says it selected these six stocks for a concentrated, high-upside portfolio targeting 30% to 50% returns over the next 12 months by heavily weighting AI and tech leaders like NVDA, PLTR, AVGO and AMZN, which are poised to capitalize on explosive data center demand and enterprise AI adoption with 25% to 40%+ earnings growth forecasts.
To balance volatility, it added LLY for blockbuster GLP-1 drug momentum in healthcare and FSLR for renewables tailwinds from AI power needs and US subsidies, ensuring diversification without diluting the core growth theme.
So the same core AI exposure and the same non-AI growth engine, but different optionality.
Now the fun part — watching these AI-driven choices go head-to-head in the market.
Over the next year, we’ll track how each portfolio performs.
We’ll be updating you regularly, after the first week, then every month, so make sure you subscribe to follow the results.
At the end of the experiment, we’ll declare a winner and analyze why one AI outperformed the other.
So, who do you think will come out on top — ChatGPT or Grok?
Comment below with your predictions.
ChatGPT thinks the big weight to Nvidia and Broadcom in Grok’s portfolio makes sense, but that it overreaches with a 20% allocation to Palantir. ChatGPT thinks it’ll win.
Grok thinks ChatGPT’s portfolio is a solid, diversified bet on the AI “picks and shovels” theme. But Grok thinks its more aggressive portfolio will win, saying Palantir is its secret sauce.
And don’t forget to like, subscribe, and hit the bell so you can watch this AI stock battle unfold in real time!
And subscribe to get our free Market Briefing newsletter for the top market stories before the bell.
To kick things off, both ChatGPT and Grok delivered portfolios that reflect their approaches to risk, diversification and where they see the biggest upside in the next 12 months.
ChatGPT built a broad but thematically tight portfolio centered on the AI infrastructure boom — chips, packaging, servers, cloud hyperscalers and even the power grid that fuels it. It also added two non-AI growth drivers for balance.
ChatGPT says it focused on “the AI build-out flywheel,” where data centers and hyperscalers are pouring in capital and where bottlenecks are creating explosive earnings growth. It added Eli Lilly to capture the GLP-1 obesity-drug boom and Cameco for potential upside if electricity shortages continue pushing utilities toward nuclear.
In short? A diversified but conviction-heavy bet on long-term AI infrastructure demand — with a dose of healthcare and nuclear optionality.
Grok took a slightly different approach: fewer stocks, bigger swings. Its portfolio is hyper-concentrated around AI winners and high-octane tech, with a few picks aimed at balancing volatility without diluting upside.

Grok says it targeted stocks with “30% to 50% return potential” over the next year, leaning heavily into AI and enterprise data adoption through Nvidia, Palantir, Broadcom and Amazon — names it believes will benefit from the surge in data-center demand and 25% to 40% or more earnings growth. It added Eli Lilly for GLP-1 momentum and First Solar for an energy-transition play boosted by AI-driven power demand and US subsidies.
The result is a high-conviction, high-volatility portfolio that mirrors Grok’s aggressive personality.
Both AIs landed on:
But their strategies diverge sharply.
ChatGPT spreads its bets across the AI supply chain and electrical grid, with multiple positions of upside. Grok swings for the fences, betting that concentration — not diversification — is the path to market-beating returns.
And both AIs? Confident they’ll win.
ChatGPT thinks Grok’s 20% allocation to Palantir is overreach.

Grok thinks Palantir is its “secret sauce.”

Over the next year, we’ll track each portfolio’s returns using both Webull and eToro’s paper trading platforms. Here’s where we stand after week one:
Subscribe to the Finder US YouTube channel to follow the battle play out visually.
At the end of the experiment, we’ll break down:
So, who’s your pick? ChatGPT’s diversified AI-infrastructure thesis or Grok’s concentrated moon-shot portfolio?