Finder’s investment experts assess brokers across nine key categories to help you objectively evaluate a broker’s overall performance and suitability for your unique needs.
The nine categories we measure are:
- Investment options
- Trading platforms and technology
- Trading costs
- Account fees
- Customer support
- Mobile app rating and security
- Features and amenities
- Cash sweep rates
- Account types and minimums
Data collection
We collect data manually through online research and from providers directly. For many of the brokers we review, our investment experts perform hands-on testing. Some brokers also provide live demonstrations of their platform and services.
Category weightings
We weigh each metric based on factors we believe are most important to traders and investors. Brokers earn a score in each category and then an overall score based on the weightings detailed on this page.
Scoring and rating
Brokers are evaluated on the nine key categories outlined on this page. These categories are broken down into 24 core elements and 76 weighted criteria. Some of these core elements are features that Finder’s experts consider perks to the main features. Providers that offer any of these perks are rewarded with additional points. However, brokers that don’t offer any of these perks are not penalized. These features include IPO access, 24/7 customer support, access to a robo-advisor, access to a financial advisor and paper trading.
We rate brokers using a system of one to five stars, incremented in tenths of a star, with 5 stars being the best possible score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Excellent
★★★★★ 4/5 — Good
★★★★★ 3/5 — Average
★★★★★ 2/5 — Subpar
★★★★★ 1/5 — Poor
Investment options
This category evaluates the total number of available investment options and the breadth and diversity of available assets. We also consider whether the broker offers IPO access.
Investment options
If a broker offers stocks, bonds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), options, mutual funds, futures, cryptocurrency and at least one other type of alternative asset, it earns the highest score. If a provider offers only stocks and ETFs, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers stocks, bonds, ETFs, options, mutual funds, futures, cryptocurrency and at least one other type of alternative asset
★★★★★ 4/5 — Offers stocks, options, ETFs/mutual funds, bonds and crypto or another type of alternative asset
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers stocks, options, ETFs and crypto or another type of alternative asset
★★★★★ 2/5 — Offers stocks, options and ETFs
★★★★★ 1/5 — Offers only stocks and ETFs
IPO access
If a broker offers IPO access, it earns the highest score. Brokers that don’t offer IPO access are not penalized.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers IPO access
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — N/A
This category examines the trading platform’s usability, functionality and availability across devices. It assesses the quality of research tools, charts and technical analysis features.
Trading platforms
If a broker offers mobile, web browser and desktop trading platforms, it earns the highest score. If a provider offers only access via a mobile app or web browser, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers mobile, web browser and desktop trading platforms
★★★★★ 4/5 — Offers two trading platforms
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers trading only via a mobile app or web browser
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — N/A
Analysis and research tools
If a platform offers robust and useful tools that are significantly better than most competing platforms, including advanced charting, free third-party research and analyst ratings and price targets, it earns the highest score. If a broker offers no analysis or research tools, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers advanced charts, screeners, watchlists, price alerts, earnings estimates, company financials, free third-party research and analyst ratings and price targets
★★★★★ 4/5 — Offers advanced charting and analysis features and research tools, but not as robust as top platforms
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers a basic mix of tools and information, such as screeners and alerts but no advanced charts or analyst research or price targets
★★★★★ 2/5 — Offers company details/statistics and news only
★★★★★ 1/5 — Offers no resources or tools
Trading costs
This category evaluates the broker’s trading fee structure, including commissions, options contract fees and any additional charges to buy or sell securities.
Commissions on stocks and ETFs
Platforms with commission-free stock and ETF trades get the highest score, while platforms that charge commissions to trade stocks and ETFs earn the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Commission-free stock and ETF trading
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — Commissions on stocks and ETFs
Options commissions and contract fees
Brokers that charge no options commissions or contract fees earn the highest score. If the broker charges contract fees on options of more than $1 per contract or options trading is not available, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — No commissions or contract fees
★★★★★ 4/5 — Commissions on options, but $1 or less in total contract fees
★★★★★ 3/5 — Commissions on options, but $0.65 or less per contract
★★★★★ 2/5 — Commissions on options, but $1 or less per options contract
★★★★★ 1/5 — Commissions on options of more than $1 per contract or options trading is not available
Margin rates
If the broker’s highest margin rate is between 6% and 10%, it earns the highest score. Brokers that don’t offer margin earn the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Margin rate of 6–10%
★★★★★ 4/5 — Margin rate of 10.01%–13%
★★★★★ 3/5 — Margin rate of 13.01% or more
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — No margin
Account fees
This category assesses annual fees, inactivity fees and outgoing account transfer fees.
Annual fee
If a broker charges no annual fee, it earns the highest score. If a platform charges an annual fee of $31 or more, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — $0
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — $1–$30
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — $31 or more
Inactivity fee
If a broker charges no inactivity fee, it earns the highest score. If a broker charges an inactivity fee that totals $150 or more annually, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — $0
★★★★★ 4/5 — $1–$49
★★★★★ 3/5 — $50–$100
★★★★★ 2/5 — $101–$149
★★★★★ 1/5 — $150 or more
Full outgoing account transfer fee
If a provider charges clients no fee to transfer their entire account to another broker, it earns the highest score. If a broker charges a fee of $101 or more, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — $0
★★★★★ 4/5 — $1–$75
★★★★★ 3/5 — $76-$100
★★★★★ 2/5 — $101 or more
★★★★★ 1/5 — N/A
Customer support
This category rates the broker’s customer support responsiveness and accessibility and evaluates available support channels, such as live chat, phone and email.
Contact methods
If a broker offers at least three ways to get help, one of which offers a response time of 10 minutes or less, it earns the highest score. If we couldn’t get in touch with customer support on multiple attempts, the broker earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — At least 3 ways to get help, 1 of which offers a response time within 10 minutes
★★★★★ 4/5 — 1 to 2 ways to get help, 1 of which offers a response time usually within 10 minutes
★★★★★ 3/5 — We got in touch with help, but it took more than 10 minutes
★★★★★ 2/5 — We got in touch with help, but it took more than a day to hear back
★★★★★ 1/5 — We couldn’t get in touch with customer support on multiple attempts
24/7 support availability
If a provider offers 24/7 customer support, it earns the highest score. If a provider doesn’t offer 24/7 support, it isn’t penalized.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers 24/7 customer support
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — N/A
Mobile app rating and security
This category analyzes a mobile app’s security measures, user reviews and ratings.
Security measures
If a broker offers two-factor authentication (2FA) and biometrics to protect customers’ accounts and information, it earns the highest score. If a platform doesn’t offer 2FA or biometrics, it earns the lowest rating.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers 2FA and biometrics to protect customers’ accounts and information
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers 2FA but not biometrics
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — Doesn’t offer 2FA or biometrics capabilities
App store ratings
We take the average of the broker’s ratings across the Apple App Store and Google Play App Store to calculate a final score.
Features and amenities
This category evaluates the availability of features such as access to advisory services, fractional shares, instant deposits, paper trading and educational resources.
Access to a robo-advisor
If a broker offers access to a robo-advisor with no advisory fees and no minimum balance requirements, it earns the highest score. Brokers that don’t offer access to a robo-advisor are not penalized.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers access to a robo-advisor with no advisory fees and no minimum balance requirements
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers access to a robo-advisor but has a minimum balance requirement or charges an annual advisory fee
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — N/A
Access to a financial advisor
If a broker offers access to a financial advisor with no advisory fees and no minimum balance requirements, it earns the highest score. Brokers that don’t offer access to a financial advisor are not penalized.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers free access to a financial advisor with no advisory fees and no minimum balance requirements
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers access to a financial advisor but has a minimum balance requirement or charges an annual advisory fee
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — N/A
Fractional shares
If a broker offers fractional shares, it earns the highest score. If a broker doesn’t offer fractional shares, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers fractional share trading
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — Doesn’t offer fractional share trading
Instant buying power
If a platform offers instant buying power, it earns the highest score. If a provider doesn’t offer instant buying power, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers instant buying power
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — Doesn’t offer instant buying power
Paper trading
If a broker offers paper trading, it earns the highest score. Brokers that don’t offer paper trading are not penalized.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers paper trading
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — N/A
Extended hours trading
If a broker offers 24/5 trading, it earns the highest score. If a broker doesn’t offer extended trading hours, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers 24/5 trading
★★★★★ 4/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers extended hours trading, but not 24/5 trading
★★★★★ 2/5 — N/A
★★★★★ 1/5 — Doesn’t offer extended hours trading or 24/5 trading
Educational resources
If a broker offers live webinars, courses, tutorials, articles, videos and live-streaming news and market commentary, it earns the highest score. Brokers that offer no educational content earn the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers live webinars, courses, tutorials, articles, videos and live-streaming news and market commentary
★★★★★ 4/5 — Offers articles, videos, interactive courses and market commentary but no live webinars
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers articles and videos but no interactive courses, market commentary or live webinars
★★★★★ 2/5 — Offers informational tools only, like newsletters and market news
★★★★★ 1/5 — Doesn’t offer any educational content
Cash sweep rates
This category assesses the annual percentage yield (APY) offered on cash balances through the broker’s cash sweep program. If a broker offers an annual percentage yield (APY) of over 5% on uninvested cash, with no additional steps needed to earn these rates, it earns the highest score. If a broker doesn’t offer a cash sweep program, it earns the lowest score.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers an APY of over 5% on uninvested cash, with no additional steps needed to earn these rates
★★★★★ 4/5 — Offers an APY of over 5% on uninvested cash but may require the customer to sign up with a separate product
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers an APY of between 1% and 5% on uninvested cash and may require the customer to sign up with a separate product
★★★★★ 2/5 — Offers an APY of less than 1% on uninvested cash and may require the customer to sign up with a separate product
★★★★★ 1/5 — Doesn’t offer a cash sweep program
Account types and minimums
This category examines a broker’s lineup of account types and minimums to open an account.
Account types
Brokers that offer individual, joint and custodial brokerage accounts, 529 plans and traditional, Roth, rollover, custodial and SEP IRAs earn the highest rating, while a broker that offers only an individual brokerage account earns the lowest rating.
★★★★★ 5/5 — Offers individual, joint and custodial brokerage accounts, 529 plans and traditional, Roth, rollover, custodial and SEP IRAs
★★★★★ 4/5 — Offers individual and joint brokerage accounts and traditional, Roth, rollover and SEP IRAs, but no custodial brokerage accounts, 529 plans or custodial IRAs
★★★★★ 3/5 — Offers individual and/or joint brokerage accounts and traditional, Roth and rollover IRAs
★★★★★ 2/5 — Offers individual and/or joint brokerage accounts, with no IRAs
★★★★★ 1/5 — Offers individual brokerage accounts only
Account minimums
Brokers that have no minimum deposit requirements earn the highest rating, while brokers with a minimum deposit requirement of more than $500 earn the lowest rating.
★★★★★ 5/5 — No minimum deposit required
★★★★★ 4/5 — Minimum deposit of $25 or less
★★★★★ 3/5 — Minimum deposit of up to $100
★★★★★ 2/5 — Minimum deposit of up to $500
★★★★★ 1/5 — Minimum deposit of more than $500
Paid non-client promotion. Finder does not invest money with providers on this page. If a brand is a referral partner, we're paid when you click or tap through to, open an account with or provide your contact information to the provider. Partnerships are not a recommendation for you to invest with any one company. Learn more about how we make money.
Finder is not an adviser or brokerage service. Information on this page is for educational purposes only and not a recommendation to invest with any one company, trade specific stocks or fund specific investments. All editorial opinions are our own.