Contributory negligence<\/h3>
If someone makes a personal injury claim following an accident, it’s not always a case that one person is clearly responsible and wholly guilty for hurting someone else.<\/p>
It’s possible that the pedestrian, passenger or other driver making the claim can be found partly responsible for their injuries. In other words they are found to have contributed to the collision.<\/p>
Should a driver prove that the other person is at fault too, the claimant will have a percentage deducted from their compensation.<\/p>
For example, if a passenger gets whiplash in a collision that was your fault, it might be decided that they won’t receive the maximum pay-out because they weren’t wearing a seat belt.<\/p><\/div><\/article>
When a driver goes into the back of another driver’s car<\/h3>
As with a vehicle-pedestrian collision, it might seem obvious who’s at fault in a rear-end collision. In truth if you go into the back of another vehicle you probably will be held responsible.<\/p>
The highway code dictates that you should leave at least a two-second gap between your vehicle and the one in front, so that if it suddenly slows up you have time to stop.<\/p>
There might be instances where you can claim they were to blame, if they reverse into you without warning for instance. However, this is rare, with insurers often siding with the person who gets rear-ended.<\/p>
Car park incidents<\/h3>
Collisions frequently happen in car parks. Cars are constantly on the move, trying to fit into tiny spaces. That’s not to mention the countless pedestrians that appear out of nowhere.<\/p>
To determine who’s at fault in a parking lot, keep two concepts in mind: who’s moving and who has the right of way.<\/p>
Here’s a breakdown of who’s at fault when cars collide in a car park.<\/p>
A driver backs out of a space and collides with an oncoming car. <\/strong>Both cars are moving, so both drivers may be deemed partly to blame. Two drivers pull out of spaces and back into each other. <\/strong>Given that both cars are moving and neither driver has the “right of way”, it’s likely both drivers will be deemed responsible.<\/p> Two cars collide while going for the same space. <\/strong>Both cars are moving so both cars could be liable. However, the vehicle turning left has the way of way, as the other driver is turning into oncoming traffic.<\/p> Admittedly there are many variables that will ultimately decide who’s to blame. Yet the driver turning right will probably be held mostly responsible for the collision.<\/p> When working out fault in a three-way collision, insurers think about the extent to which a driver contributed to the accident. As you might expect, the vehicle out front will typically get less blame than the end vehicle. Yet this isn’t always the case.<\/p> Mostly, the front car won’t be found to be at fault in a three-way incident. However, the driver could be found partially to blame for reckless driving. The middle car may be held partially responsible for damage to the front car if they didn’t keep sufficient space between them and the leading car. Meanwhile they might take full blame for the pileup if they’re found negligent, having no brake lights and slamming their brakes on for example.<\/li> Typically, the driver at the back of the pileup will take most of the responsibility for the collision, although in certain cases the driver of the end car will be able to pursue claims against the other drivers for negligence.<\/li><\/ul>
However, the driver backing out is more likely to be held responsible, as cars driving in the main lanes of the car park tend to have the right of way.<\/p>In a three-way collision<\/h3>
Leading car<\/h5>
For example, they may have slammed their brakes and had broken brake lights.<\/li>Middle car<\/h5>
End car<\/h5>
Frequently asked questions<\/h3>
\n