Month-to-month broadband plans offer greater flexibility but typically come with higher upfront costs
Contract broadband plans usually work out cheaper over the long run – provided you don’t need to cancel your contract early
Increased competition has led more Internet providers to offer month-to-month plans, resulting in better deals for consumers.
While Internet speeds, monthly data caps and price tend to serve as the primary points of comparison when shopping for a new broadband plan, they’re not the only factors worth considering.
Contract length can have just as much impact on the value of a plan, especially if you’re renting or you’re living in a household with fluctuating Internet needs. Do you go for the long-term commitment and save a few bucks a month off your bill? Or do you swallow the upfront costs of a no-lock-in contract for the freedom of cancelling your service at any time?
To help you decide which type of contract is best for you, we’ve weighed up the pros and cons of both below.
No cancellation fees. Whatever the reason, if you need to terminate your month-to-month broadband service, you can do so at any time without penalty. You won’t have to wade through a sea of confusing forms to cancel your service, and you won’t be out of pocket, either.
The freedom to re-contract at any time. If your Internet service isn’t living up to your expectations, a month-to-month contract gives you the ability to sign up for a new plan at any time, either with the same provider or with a different one completely. This is especially useful if you want to put a plan through its paces in a real-world scenario before committing for the long haul.
Accommodating to life’s unforeseen inconveniences. When life takes a detour into the chaotic, a locked-in broadband contract isn’t something you want to be worrying about. Whether you have to move suddenly due to a natural disaster or unexpected financial burdens have left you short of cash, not having to pay out a two-year contract can make a bad situation slightly more bearable.
Steeper upfront costs. Most month-to-month contracts include some form of one-off payment to offset the fact you can cancel the service at any time without penalty. Depending on the provider, this fee can consist of activation charges, mandatory equipment costs like a new compatible modem and a “casual” surcharge, with the total cost potentially in the many hundreds of dollars.
Higher monthly payments. Some providers also charge a higher monthly rate for their month-to-month plans to make the longer commitment more attractive. In these cases, a fixed-term contract can be a considerably better deal if you don’t plan on cancelling your service any time soon.
Fewer upfront costs. The activation fees and modem charges common on month-to-month contracts are typically waived on longer contracts, meaning your first bill is more likely to match the monthly rate you signed up for.
More extras. To encourage loyalty, many providers throw in extras on their long-term plans. These goodies can range from free routers to complimentary subscriptions for streaming services.
Cheaper monthly rates. As extra incentive to stick around for the long haul, some providers price their contracted plans lower than comparable month-to-month plans, trading savings for loyalty.
Exclusive plans. In some cases, certain higher-value plans and entertainment bundles are only available on 24-month contracts. To take advantage of these offers, your only option is to commit for the full two years.
Steep early termination charges. Ending any contracted service before its full term is up means paying out a hefty penalty – one that is often in the many hundreds of dollars. If you’ve got a phone or entertainment service bundled up with your broadband, the charge gets even steeper.
Inflexible when it comes to life’s unforeseeable mishaps. On a long-term contract, you’ll have no easy out if you suddenly need to cancel your service because you’re moving house, struggling financially or for any other reason you might encounter.
Matt Sayer is a technology writer and editorial engineer for Finder, combining industry expertise with data-driven solutions to help people make better decisions. His extensive portfolio spans investigate reporting on the roll-out of 5G, statistical analysis on the legacy of E3 and guides for popular products like mobile phones and smart speakers. Matt has a Bachelor of Computer Science from RMIT University and is passionate about finding ways that technology can better our lives.
How likely would you be to recommend finder to a friend or colleague?
Very UnlikelyExtremely Likely
Thank you for your feedback.
Our goal is to create the best possible product, and your thoughts, ideas and suggestions play a major role in helping us identify opportunities to improve.
finder.com is an independent comparison platform and information service that aims to provide you with the tools you need to make better decisions. While we are independent, the offers that appear on this site are from companies from which finder.com receives compensation. We may receive compensation from our partners for placement of their products or services. We may also receive compensation if you click on certain links posted on our site. While compensation arrangements may affect the order, position or placement of product information, it doesn't influence our assessment of those products. Please don't interpret the order in which products appear on our Site as any endorsement or recommendation from us. finder.com compares a wide range of products, providers and services but we don't provide information on all available products, providers or services. Please appreciate that there may be other options available to you than the products, providers or services covered by our service.