Bitcoin trader arrested for failure to practise security theatre | finder.com

Bitcoin trader arrested for failure to practice ‘security theatre’

Andrew Munro 21 August 2018 NEWS

The trader allegedly used bitcoin to launder money, without a licence to write it off as an accident.

OPINION

Security Theatre: The practice of investing in countermeasures intended to provide the feeling of improved security while doing little or nothing to achieve it.”

21-year-old Jacob Burrell Campos was arrested crossing the border from Mexico to the United States and is facing trial on 31 charges, including operating an illegal money transmitting business, failing to maintain an anti-money laundering program, international money laundering and conspiracy to structure monetary transactions, according to his recently-unsealed indictment (PDF).

It’s alleged that Campos moved almost US$1 million over 971 individual transactions on behalf of 900 customers between 2015 and 2017, charging about 5% in fees each time for profits of somewhere under $50,000 over the course of two years.

For running an unlicensed money transmitting business, he’s facing up to five years in prison. For conspiracy to structure monetary transactions, he’s facing up to another five years. For failing to maintain an anti-money laundering program, he’s facing up to another ten years. And then there’s a maximum possible charge of up to 20 years for each of the 28 charges of money laundering with bitcoin.

Campos’s activities “blew a giant hole” through the legal framework of US anti-money laundering laws, said Assistant US Attorney Robert Ciaffa at the bond hearing, by soliciting and introducing into the US banking system close to $1 million in unregulated cash.

Speaking of blowing giant holes, regulated US banks are thought to handle between $500 billion and $1.5 trillion of dirty money per year, but almost no charges are ever levied even when banks explicitly fail to act on explicit warnings. Australia’s Big Four banks meanwhile are estimated to move about $5 million of drug money per day. Meanwhile, Commonwealth Bank’s recent charges, including a failure to punctually report 53,506 suspicious transactions and a failure to take action even after becoming aware of suspected money laundering by account-holders, only got it a very gentle slap on the wrist.



Based on the charges levied against individuals for allegedly moving small amounts of dirty money, and not levied against corporations even as they allegedly knowingly oversee constant and massive floods of dirty money through their accounts, the actual crime that gets charged is a failure to perform appropriate security theatre. It doesn’t matter how much you actually hinder or help the flow of dirty money, so much as whether you’re licensed to act out the motions of security theatre.

That’s not to criticise banks or any other suitably theatrical financial institution – anyone’s legal obligations extend only as far as following the letter of the law. But at the same time, a law is only effective if it actually has an effect on the behaviour it’s intended to impact. Without actually looking at this cause and effect, the laws which are intended to make society into a better place are just a series of punitive examples.

In this case, actually combating the problem of money laundering means being fully aware that the laws are currently not working as intended. Campos’s alleged crime wasn’t actually laundering money, so much as laundering money without having the licences and the clout to successfully plead ignorance.

Counter-intuitively, the more experienced, licenced and better-funded an entity is, the more likely they are to successfully argue that it was all an accident and they had no way of knowing.

This is a sentiment clearly shown in Ciaffa’s point that Campos only moved money across the border in amounts under $10,000 at a time in order to skirt currency reporting laws. To put it another way, Campos went out of his way to obey the law, and it’s now being held against him.

Good thing no one told Campos that prepaid cards are exempt from those currency reporting laws, and that carrying more than $10,000 in cash-equivalent cards across the US-Mexico border without reporting it is perfectly legal (or at least was as of 2011 – none of this should be taken as anything remotely resembling legal advice).

This might seem like an egregious oversight, but it’s not. The US Treasury Department is fully aware that cartels are using this loophole to shift large amounts of cash across the border. They just can’t do anything about it because efforts to close that loophole have been blocked by Visa and other card providers.

Campos is currently being held without bail as he awaits trial. Meanwhile, the flow of dirty money around the world has not been discernibly impacted in any way whatsoever and no one is safer in any way.

For his alleged failure to practise appropriate security theatre, Campos will now become the victim of security theatre. At least the punishment fits the crime.


Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author holds ETH, IOTA, ICX, VET, XLM, BTC and ADA.

Disclaimer: This information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of cryptocurrency or any specific provider, service or offering. It is not a recommendation to trade. Cryptocurrencies are speculative, complex and involve significant risks – they are highly volatile and sensitive to secondary activity. Performance is unpredictable and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Consider your own circumstances, and obtain your own advice, before relying on this information. You should also verify the nature of any product or service (including its legal status and relevant regulatory requirements) and consult the relevant Regulators' websites before making any decision. Finder, or the author, may have holdings in the cryptocurrencies discussed.

Latest cryptocurrency news

Picture: Shutterstock

Ask an Expert

You are about to post a question on finder.com:

  • Do not enter personal information (eg. surname, phone number, bank details) as your question will be made public
  • finder.com is a financial comparison and information service, not a bank or product provider
  • We cannot provide you with personal advice or recommendations
  • Your answer might already be waiting – check previous questions below to see if yours has already been asked

Finder only provides general advice and factual information, so consider your own circumstances, or seek advice before you decide to act on our content. By submitting a question, you're accepting our Privacy and Cookies Policy and Terms of Use.
Go to site